| Title |
Guillain-Barré Syndrome outbreak associated with Zika virus infection in French Polynesia: a case-control study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00562-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Van-Mai Cao-Lormeau, Alexandre Blake, Sandrine Mons, Stéphane Lastère, Claudine Roche, Jessica Vanhomwegen, Timothée Dub, Laure Baudouin, Anita Teissier, Philippe Larre, Anne-Laure Vial, Christophe Decam, Valérie Choumet, Susan K Halstead, Hugh J Willison, Lucile Musset, Jean-Claude Manuguerra, Philippe Despres, Emmanuel Fournier, Henri-Pierre Mallet, Didier Musso, Arnaud Fontanet, Jean Neil, Frédéric Ghawché |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 497 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 75 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 34 | 7% |
| France | 25 | 5% |
| Spain | 25 | 5% |
| Brazil | 12 | 2% |
| Japan | 11 | 2% |
| Mexico | 11 | 2% |
| Colombia | 11 | 2% |
| Canada | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 90 | 18% |
| Unknown | 193 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 357 | 72% |
| Scientists | 60 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 58 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 22 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,821 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 14 | <1% |
| United States | 10 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1777 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 330 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 289 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 230 | 13% |
| Researcher | 206 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 103 | 6% |
| Other | 336 | 18% |
| Unknown | 327 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 394 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 264 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 251 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 150 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 63 | 3% |
| Other | 309 | 17% |
| Unknown | 390 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2172. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,043
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#180
of 42,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44
of 313,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#2
of 447 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 447 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.