You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Perceived discrimination, health and wellbeing among middle-aged and older lesbian, gay and bisexual people: A prospective study
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0216497 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah E. Jackson, Ruth A. Hackett, Igor Grabovac, Lee Smith, Andrew Steptoe |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 33% |
United States | 3 | 14% |
New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
Austria | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 48% |
Scientists | 7 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 132 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
Unspecified | 12 | 9% |
Researcher | 8 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 17% |
Unknown | 38 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 18 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 11% |
Psychology | 14 | 11% |
Unspecified | 12 | 9% |
Other | 15 | 11% |
Unknown | 42 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,637,562
of 24,413,320 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#20,578
of 210,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,674
of 354,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#365
of 2,780 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,413,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,780 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.