↓ Skip to main content

Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011549
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanja Giljaca, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Yemisi Takwoingi, David Higgie, Goran Poropat, Davor Štimac, Brian R Davidson

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Unknown 242 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 14%
Other 29 12%
Student > Postgraduate 27 11%
Researcher 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Other 56 23%
Unknown 57 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 125 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 6%
Unspecified 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 69 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,311,744
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,000
of 12,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,403
of 255,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#256
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.