↓ Skip to main content

Treatment for IgG and IgA paraproteinaemic neuropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment for IgG and IgA paraproteinaemic neuropathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005376.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abraham CJ Stork, Michael PT Lunn, Eduardo Nobile-Orazio, Nicolette C Notermans

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 23%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Other 4 5%
Other 18 24%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 15%
Neuroscience 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 9 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2016.
All research outputs
#1,872,359
of 12,362,061 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,796
of 8,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,753
of 279,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#72
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,362,061 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.