You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Looking upstream: enhancers of child nutritional status in post-flood rural settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PeerJ, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.7717/peerj.1741 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jose Manuel Rodriguez-Llanes, Shishir Ranjan-Dash, Alok Mukhopadhyay, Debarati Guha-Sapir |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 144 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 24% |
| Researcher | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 37 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 47 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2017.
All research outputs
#7,955,341
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PeerJ
#6,205
of 15,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,887
of 314,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PeerJ
#171
of 348 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 348 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.