You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Investigating the effectiveness of an online acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) intervention versus a waiting list control condition on pain interference and quality of life in adults with chronic pain and multimorbidity: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012671 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian W Slattery, Laura L O'Connor, Stephanie Haugh, Katie Barrett, Kady Francis, Christopher P Dwyer, Siobhan O'Higgins, Line Caes, Jonathan Egan, Brian E McGuire |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 179 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 11% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 77 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 47 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 78 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,077,000
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#12,095
of 22,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,601
of 350,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#446
of 753 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 753 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.