↓ Skip to main content

Investigating the effectiveness of an online acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) intervention versus a waiting list control condition on pain interference and quality of life in adults with…

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Investigating the effectiveness of an online acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) intervention versus a waiting list control condition on pain interference and quality of life in adults with chronic pain and multimorbidity: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMJ Open, May 2019
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012671
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian W Slattery, Laura L O’Connor, Stephanie Haugh, Katie Barrett, Kady Francis, Christopher P Dwyer, Siobhan O’Higgins, Line Caes, Jonathan Egan, Brian E McGuire

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 27%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 18 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#5,347,188
of 17,648,139 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#8,708
of 16,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,968
of 275,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#418
of 752 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,648,139 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 752 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.