You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
| Title |
How are functionally similar code clones syntactically different? An empirical study and a benchmark
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PeerJ Computer Science, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.7717/peerj-cs.49 |
| Authors |
Stefan Wagner, Asim Abdulkhaleq, Ivan Bogicevic, Jan-Peter Ostberg, Jasmin Ramadani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 20% |
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 22% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 20 | 74% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |