↓ Skip to main content

Critical disability studies, Brexit and Trump: a time of neoliberal–ableism

Overview of attention for article published in Rethinking History, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 195)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 tweeters
Title
Critical disability studies, Brexit and Trump: a time of neoliberal–ableism
Published in
Rethinking History, May 2019
DOI 10.1080/13642529.2019.1607476
Authors

Dan Goodley, Rebecca Lawthom

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2019.
All research outputs
#917,716
of 12,986,305 outputs
Outputs from Rethinking History
#15
of 195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,123
of 173,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rethinking History
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,986,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them