↓ Skip to main content

Critical disability studies, Brexit and Trump: a time of neoliberal–ableism

Overview of attention for article published in Rethinking History, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 203)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
41 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Critical disability studies, Brexit and Trump: a time of neoliberal–ableism
Published in
Rethinking History, May 2019
DOI 10.1080/13642529.2019.1607476
Authors

Dan Goodley, Rebecca Lawthom

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 33%
Sports and Recreations 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%
Psychology 1 17%
Arts and Humanities 1 17%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2019.
All research outputs
#607,337
of 13,640,858 outputs
Outputs from Rethinking History
#3
of 203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,839
of 252,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rethinking History
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,640,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them