You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The wisdom of partisan crowds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1817195116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joshua Becker, Ethan Porter, Damon Centola |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 24% |
| Japan | 10 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 8% |
| Denmark | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 51% |
| Scientists | 32 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 164 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 21% |
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 18% |
| Unknown | 35 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 41 | 25% |
| Psychology | 29 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 18% |
| Unknown | 41 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 151. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#278,371
of 25,844,815 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#5,100
of 103,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,619
of 366,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#99
of 948 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,844,815 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 948 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.