↓ Skip to main content

Effects of mean arterial pressure on arousal in sedated ventilated patients with septic shock: a SEPSISPAM post hoc exploratory study

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of mean arterial pressure on arousal in sedated ventilated patients with septic shock: a SEPSISPAM post hoc exploratory study
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, May 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13613-019-0528-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Youenn Jouan, Valérie Seegers, Ferhat Meziani, Fabien Grelon, Bruno Megarbane, Nadia Anguel, Jean-Paul Mira, Pierre-François Dequin, Soizic Gergaud, Nicolas Weiss, François Legay, Yves Le Tulzo, Marie Conrad, René Robert, Frédéric Gonzalez, Christophe Guitton, Fabienne Tamion, Jean-Marie Tonnelier, Pierre Guezennec, Thierry Van Der Linden, Antoine Vieillard-Baron, Peter Radermacher, Pierre Asfar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 16%
Professor 3 12%
Other 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2019.
All research outputs
#18,020,520
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#894
of 1,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,149
of 350,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#19
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.