You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biochemical tests of placental function versus ultrasound assessment of fetal size for stillbirth and small‐for‐gestational‐age infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012245.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexander EP Heazell, Dexter JL Hayes, Melissa Whitworth, Yemisi Takwoingi, Susan E Bayliss, Clare Davenport |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 50% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 75% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 307 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 10% |
| Researcher | 27 | 9% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 62 | 20% |
| Unknown | 109 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 16 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 5% |
| Psychology | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 29 | 9% |
| Unknown | 120 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,004,395
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,230
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,705
of 366,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#79
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.