You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Retraction Note: Improving usability and pregnancy rates of a fertility monitor by an additional mobile application: results of a retrospective efficacy study of Daysy and DaysyView app
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Health, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12978-019-0728-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin C. Koch, Johannes Lermann, Niels van de Roemer, Simone K. Renner, Stefanie Burghaus, Janina Hackl, Ralf Dittrich, Sven Kehl, Patricia G. Oppelt, Thomas Hildebrandt, Caroline C. Hack, Uwe G. Pöhls, Stefan P. Renner, Falk C. Thiel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 36 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 6% |
| France | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Philippines | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 41 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 63 | 63% |
| Scientists | 26 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 23% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 177. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#230,350
of 25,651,057 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#14
of 1,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,613
of 366,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#3
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,651,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.