You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Social interaction in augmented reality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0216290 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark Roman Miller, Hanseul Jun, Fernanda Herrera, Jacob Yu Villa, Greg Welch, Jeremy N. Bailenson |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 8% |
| France | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Iceland | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 78% |
| Scientists | 12 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 339 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 338 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 10% |
| Researcher | 29 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 55 | 16% |
| Unknown | 103 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 67 | 20% |
| Psychology | 31 | 9% |
| Engineering | 22 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 60 | 18% |
| Unknown | 118 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 171. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2021.
All research outputs
#223,080
of 24,482,039 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3,268
of 211,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,650
of 356,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#58
of 2,769 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,482,039 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 211,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,769 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.