↓ Skip to main content

The rise of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in international development in historical perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Theory & Society, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 375)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
144 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The rise of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in international development in historical perspective
Published in
Theory & Society, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11186-019-09352-6
Authors

Luciana de Souza Leão, Gil Eyal

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 144 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Other 5 7%
Other 17 25%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 34 49%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 9 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2021.
All research outputs
#238,654
of 17,180,236 outputs
Outputs from Theory & Society
#4
of 375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,561
of 273,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory & Society
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,180,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.