↓ Skip to main content

Vocational rehabilitation for people with severe mental illness

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
21 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
223 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vocational rehabilitation for people with severe mental illness
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2001
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003080
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth Crowther, Max Marshall, Gary R Bond, Peter Huxley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 143 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 21%
Psychology 26 17%
Social Sciences 24 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 28 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2017.
All research outputs
#575,205
of 15,046,681 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,616
of 11,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,763
of 217,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 526 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,046,681 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 526 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.