↓ Skip to main content

Exogenous proteinogenic amino acids induce systemic resistance in rice

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exogenous proteinogenic amino acids induce systemic resistance in rice
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12870-016-0748-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naoki Kadotani, Aya Akagi, Hiroshi Takatsuji, Tetsuya Miwa, Daisuke Igarashi

Abstract

Plant immune responses can be induced by endogenous and exogenous signaling molecules. Recently, amino acids and their metabolites have been reported to affect the plant immune system. However, how amino acids act in plant defense responses has yet to be clarified. Here, we report that treatment of rice roots with amino acids such as glutamate (Glu) induced systemic disease resistance against rice blast in leaves. Treatment of roots with Glu activated the transcription of a large variety of defense-related genes both in roots and leaves. In leaves, salicylic acid (SA)-responsive genes, rather than jasmonic acid (JA) or ethylene (ET)-responsive genes, were induced by this treatment. The Glu-induced blast resistance was partially impaired in rice plants deficient in SA signaling such as NahG plants expressing an SA hydroxylase, WRKY45-knockdown, and OsNPR1-knockdown plants. The JA-deficient mutant cpm2 exhibited full Glu-induced blast resistance. Our results indicate that the amino acid-induced blast resistance partly depends on the SA pathway but an unknown SA-independent signaling pathway is also involved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 87 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 29 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 30 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,511,008
of 24,387,992 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#120
of 3,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,590
of 303,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#1
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,387,992 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,420 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.