You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Role of nanoparticle size and sialic acids in the distinct time-evolution profiles of nanoparticle uptake in hematopoietic progenitor cells and monocytes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-019-0495-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bart Wathiong, Sarah Deville, An Jacobs, Nick Smisdom, Pascal Gervois, Ivo Lambrichts, Marcel Ameloot, Jef Hooyberghs, Inge Nelissen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 2 | 50% |
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 26% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2019.
All research outputs
#13,574,455
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#424
of 1,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,572
of 351,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#9
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,459 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.