↓ Skip to main content

Veto power and power-sharing: insights from Burundi (2000–2018)

Overview of attention for article published in Democratization, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 554)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Veto power and power-sharing: insights from Burundi (2000–2018)
Published in
Democratization, May 2019
DOI 10.1080/13510347.2019.1611781
Authors

Allison McCulloch, Stef Vandeginste

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Professor 1 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2019.
All research outputs
#698,991
of 13,727,890 outputs
Outputs from Democratization
#49
of 554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,130
of 252,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Democratization
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,727,890 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.