↓ Skip to main content

Slow emergencies: Temporality and the racialized biopolitics of emergency governance

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Human Geography, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 1,035)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
64 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Slow emergencies: Temporality and the racialized biopolitics of emergency governance
Published in
Progress in Human Geography, May 2019
DOI 10.1177/0309132519849263
Authors

Ben Anderson, Kevin Grove, Lauren Rickards, Matthew Kearnes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 167 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 24%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Researcher 14 8%
Student > Master 13 8%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 38 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 75 45%
Environmental Science 15 9%
Arts and Humanities 13 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 42 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,066,352
of 25,660,026 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Human Geography
#50
of 1,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,547
of 366,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Human Geography
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,660,026 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.