You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients after planned extubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2465-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Youfeng Zhu, Haiyan Yin, Rui Zhang, Xiaoling Ye, Jianrui Wei |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 158 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 13 | 8% |
| United States | 12 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 6% |
| Mexico | 9 | 6% |
| Colombia | 5 | 3% |
| Germany | 5 | 3% |
| Turkey | 4 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 16% |
| Unknown | 69 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 116 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 27 | 17% |
| Scientists | 11 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 27 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2019.
All research outputs
#458,658
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#263
of 6,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,806
of 366,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#4
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.