↓ Skip to main content

Do Changes in Material Circumstances Drive Support for Populist Radical Parties? Panel Data Evidence from the Netherlands during the Great Recession, 2007–2015

Overview of attention for article published in European Sociological Review, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 948)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
100 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do Changes in Material Circumstances Drive Support for Populist Radical Parties? Panel Data Evidence from the Netherlands during the Great Recession, 2007–2015
Published in
European Sociological Review, May 2019
DOI 10.1093/esr/jcz023
Authors

Noam Gidron, Jonathan J B Mijs

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 24%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 37 69%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 7%
Psychology 4 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 5 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2020.
All research outputs
#430,717
of 19,200,799 outputs
Outputs from European Sociological Review
#24
of 948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,849
of 281,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Sociological Review
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,200,799 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.