↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003814.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elliot Abt, Alan B Carr, Helen V Worthington

Abstract

Management of individuals presenting with partial loss of teeth is a common task for dentists. Outcomes important to the management of missing teeth in the partially absent dentition should be systematically summarized. This review recognizes both the challenges associated with such a summarization and the critical nature of the information for patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 146 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Postgraduate 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 66%
Psychology 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Materials Science 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 24 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2015.
All research outputs
#3,330,932
of 14,335,289 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,963
of 10,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,365
of 121,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,335,289 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.