↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003814.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elliot Abt, Alan B Carr, Helen V Worthington

Abstract

Management of individuals presenting with partial loss of teeth is a common task for dentists. Outcomes important to the management of missing teeth in the partially absent dentition should be systematically summarized. This review recognizes both the challenges associated with such a summarization and the critical nature of the information for patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 171 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Student > Postgraduate 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Researcher 18 10%
Other 49 28%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 64%
Unspecified 25 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Psychology 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2015.
All research outputs
#2,171,322
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,512
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,976
of 117,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.