You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003814.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elliot Abt, Alan B Carr, Helen V Worthington |
| Abstract |
Management of individuals presenting with partial loss of teeth is a common task for dentists. Outcomes important to the management of missing teeth in the partially absent dentition should be systematically summarized. This review recognizes both the challenges associated with such a summarization and the critical nature of the information for patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 11% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 11% |
| Chile | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 181 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 24% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 12% |
| Researcher | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 20% |
| Unknown | 28 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 118 | 65% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 36 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2015.
All research outputs
#6,406,508
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,115
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,929
of 258,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#105
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.