↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: management of soft tissues for dental implants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: management of soft tissues for dental implants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006697.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Esposito, Hassan Maghaireh, Maria Gabriella Grusovin, Ioannis Ziounas, Helen V Worthington

Abstract

Dental implants are usually placed by elevating a soft tissue flap, but in some instances, they can also be placed flapless reducing patient discomfort. Several flap designs and suturing techniques have been proposed. Soft tissues are often manipulated and augmented for aesthetic reasons. It is often recommended that implants are surrounded by a sufficient width of attached/keratinised mucosa to improve their long-term prognosis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 128 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 23%
Student > Postgraduate 23 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 33 25%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 103 77%
Unspecified 15 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Materials Science 4 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2016.
All research outputs
#1,043,949
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,032
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,474
of 117,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.