You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
メアリ・アニング (Mary Anning 1799-1847) 研究に学ぶこと
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Fossils, September 1999
|
| DOI | 10.14825/kaseki.66.0_34 |
| Authors |
矢島 道子 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,367,148
of 25,547,324 outputs
Outputs from Fossils
#3
of 109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,619
of 35,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fossils
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,547,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 109 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them