↓ Skip to main content

Feedbacks between inundation, root production, and shoot growth in a rapidly submerging brackish marsh

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ecology, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
202 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feedbacks between inundation, root production, and shoot growth in a rapidly submerging brackish marsh
Published in
Journal of Ecology, February 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2012.01957.x
Authors

Matthew L. Kirwan, Glenn R. Guntenspergen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 195 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 26%
Researcher 37 18%
Student > Master 34 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 5%
Student > Bachelor 8 4%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 32 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 79 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 28 14%
Engineering 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 40 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2012.
All research outputs
#16,744,582
of 24,629,540 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ecology
#3,028
of 3,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,532
of 256,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ecology
#26
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,629,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,365 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.