The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Evaluation of anatomical pelvic parameters between normal, healthy men and women using three-dimensional computed tomography: a cross-sectional study of sex-specific and age-specific differences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13018-019-1165-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Norio Imai, Hayato Suzuki, Asami Nozaki, Dai Miyasaka, Kazuki Tsuchiya, Tomoyuki Ito, Izumi Minato, Naoto Endo |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 16% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 20 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2024.
All research outputs
#8,562,611
of 26,245,199 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#391
of 1,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,621
of 367,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#9
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,199 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,717 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.