↓ Skip to main content

Relation of clinical culture method to T-cell memory status and efficacy in xenograft models of adoptive immunotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Cytotherapy, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relation of clinical culture method to T-cell memory status and efficacy in xenograft models of adoptive immunotherapy
Published in
Cytotherapy, May 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jcyt.2013.10.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

David M. Barrett, Nathan Singh, Xiaojun Liu, Shuguang Jiang, Carl H. June, Stephan A. Grupp, Yangbing Zhao

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 28%
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Unspecified 6 8%
Other 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 12%
Engineering 7 9%
Other 12 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2016.
All research outputs
#3,434,482
of 12,051,271 outputs
Outputs from Cytotherapy
#318
of 854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,441
of 290,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cytotherapy
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,051,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 854 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.