You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A high-throughput delayed fluorescence method reveals underlying differences in the control of circadian rhythms in Triticum aestivum and Brassica napus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-019-0436-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hannah Rees, Susan Duncan, Peter Gould, Rachel Wells, Mark Greenwood, Thomas Brabbs, Anthony Hall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 50% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Scientists | 5 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 48% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 12% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2021.
All research outputs
#847,097
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#17
of 1,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,458
of 365,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.