↓ Skip to main content

Mucolytic agents versus placebo for chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
66 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mucolytic agents versus placebo for chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001287.pub6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phillippa Poole, Kavin Sathananthan, Rebecca Fortescue

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Unspecified 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Other 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 46%
Unspecified 4 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 4 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2019.
All research outputs
#360,515
of 13,396,694 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,039
of 10,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,832
of 245,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,396,694 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.