↓ Skip to main content

Mucolytic agents versus placebo for chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
65 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mucolytic agents versus placebo for chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001287.pub6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phillippa Poole, Kavin Sathananthan, Rebecca Fortescue

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 255 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 13%
Student > Master 33 13%
Researcher 21 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 5%
Other 46 18%
Unknown 89 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 5%
Unspecified 7 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 99 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2022.
All research outputs
#697,360
of 21,989,856 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,478
of 12,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,669
of 290,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,989,856 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.