You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Toward a comprehensive view of cancer immune responsiveness: a synopsis from the SITC workshop
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40425-019-0602-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Davide Bedognetti, Michele Ceccarelli, Lorenzo Galluzzi, Rongze Lu, Karolina Palucka, Josue Samayoa, Stefani Spranger, Sarah Warren, Kwok-Kin Wong, Elad Ziv, Diego Chowell, Lisa M. Coussens, Daniel D. De Carvalho, David G. DeNardo, Jérôme Galon, Howard L. Kaufman, Tomas Kirchhoff, Michael T. Lotze, Jason J. Luke, Andy J. Minn, Katerina Politi, Leonard D. Shultz, Richard Simon, Vésteinn Thórsson, Joanne B. Weidhaas, Maria Libera Ascierto, Paolo Antonio Ascierto, James M. Barnes, Valentin Barsan, Praveen K. Bommareddy, Adrian Bot, Sarah E. Church, Gennaro Ciliberto, Andrea De Maria, Dobrin Draganov, Winson S. Ho, Heather M. McGee, Anne Monette, Joseph F. Murphy, Paola Nisticò, Wungki Park, Maulik Patel, Michael Quigley, Laszlo Radvanyi, Harry Raftopoulos, Nils-Petter Rudqvist, Alexandra Snyder, Randy F. Sweis, Sara Valpione, Roberta Zappasodi, Lisa H. Butterfield, Mary L. Disis, Bernard A. Fox, Alessandra Cesano, Francesco M. Marincola |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 33% |
| Spain | 5 | 10% |
| France | 3 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 4% |
| Colombia | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 50% |
| Scientists | 15 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 180 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 56 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 16 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Unknown | 61 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,482,369
of 25,525,181 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#379
of 3,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,291
of 364,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#11
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,525,181 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.