↓ Skip to main content

Male participation in prevention programmes of mother to child transmission of HIV: a protocol for a systematic review to identify barriers, facilitators and reported interventions

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Male participation in prevention programmes of mother to child transmission of HIV: a protocol for a systematic review to identify barriers, facilitators and reported interventions
Published in
Systematic Reviews, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-1-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frederick LI Morfaw, Lehana Thabane, Lawrence CE Mbuagbaw, Philip N Nana

Abstract

Infection with the HIV and AIDS are leading causes of morbidity and mortality among women and children worldwide. Prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) programs were developed to protect women and their babies from having HIV infection. However, knowledge on how male participation has been applied to these programs is limited. We present a research protocol for a review which seeks to determine the effects of male participation on female uptake of PMTCT programs, and assess how this male participation has been investigated and documented worldwide.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
India 1 1%
Unknown 77 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 25%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 43%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2012.
All research outputs
#17,655,675
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,690
of 1,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,189
of 155,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.