You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Male participation in prevention programmes of mother to child transmission of HIV: a protocol for a systematic review to identify barriers, facilitators and reported interventions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, February 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-1-13 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Frederick LI Morfaw, Lehana Thabane, Lawrence CE Mbuagbaw, Philip N Nana |
Abstract |
Infection with the HIV and AIDS are leading causes of morbidity and mortality among women and children worldwide. Prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) programs were developed to protect women and their babies from having HIV infection. However, knowledge on how male participation has been applied to these programs is limited. We present a research protocol for a review which seeks to determine the effects of male participation on female uptake of PMTCT programs, and assess how this male participation has been investigated and documented worldwide. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 3% |
India | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 77 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 25% |
Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 15% |
Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 43% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 15% |
Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2012.
All research outputs
#17,655,675
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,690
of 1,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,189
of 155,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.