↓ Skip to main content

Opposing roles for amygdala and vmPFC in the return of appetitive conditioned responses in humans

Overview of attention for article published in Translational Psychiatry, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Opposing roles for amygdala and vmPFC in the return of appetitive conditioned responses in humans
Published in
Translational Psychiatry, May 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41398-019-0482-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Ebrahimi, Stefan P. Koch, Charlotte Pietrock, Thomas Fydrich, Andreas Heinz, Florian Schlagenhauf

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 28%
Neuroscience 17 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 21 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,513,378
of 24,147,581 outputs
Outputs from Translational Psychiatry
#1,467
of 3,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,237
of 354,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Translational Psychiatry
#22
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,147,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.