↓ Skip to main content

Understanding the consequences of education inequality on cardiovascular disease: mendelian randomisation study

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
237 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding the consequences of education inequality on cardiovascular disease: mendelian randomisation study
Published in
British Medical Journal, May 2019
DOI 10.1136/bmj.l1855
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alice R Carter, Dipender Gill, Neil M Davies, Amy E Taylor, Taavi Tillmann, Julien Vaucher, Robyn E Wootton, Marcus R Munafò, Gibran Hemani, Rainer Malik, Sudha Seshadri, Daniel Woo, Stephen Burgess, George Davey Smith, Michael V Holmes, Ioanna Tzoulaki, Laura D Howe, Abbas Dehghan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 237 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 28%
Researcher 5 20%
Unspecified 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Other 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 16%
Unspecified 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Other 5 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 317. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#37,060
of 13,579,547 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#707
of 44,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,188
of 251,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#33
of 774 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,579,547 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 774 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.