↓ Skip to main content

Is evolution Darwinian or/and Lamarckian?

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Direct, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 538)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
231 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
626 Mendeley
citeulike
20 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is evolution Darwinian or/and Lamarckian?
Published in
Biology Direct, November 2009
DOI 10.1186/1745-6150-4-42
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugene V Koonin, Yuri I Wolf

Abstract

The year 2009 is the 200th anniversary of the publication of Jean-Bapteste Lamarck's Philosophie Zoologique and the 150th anniversary of Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species. Lamarck believed that evolution is driven primarily by non-randomly acquired, beneficial phenotypic changes, in particular, those directly affected by the use of organs, which Lamarck believed to be inheritable. In contrast, Darwin assigned a greater importance to random, undirected change that provided material for natural selection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 626 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 17 3%
United States 9 1%
Germany 5 <1%
Russia 5 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Turkey 2 <1%
Other 20 3%
Unknown 556 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 153 24%
Researcher 124 20%
Student > Bachelor 77 12%
Student > Master 75 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 31 5%
Other 99 16%
Unknown 67 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 333 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 97 15%
Social Sciences 16 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 2%
Other 77 12%
Unknown 77 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,174,941
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#23
of 538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,167
of 107,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.