↓ Skip to main content

Ecosystem restoration with teeth: what role for predators?

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
555 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ecosystem restoration with teeth: what role for predators?
Published in
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, May 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2012.01.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Euan G. Ritchie, Bodil Elmhagen, Alistair S. Glen, Mike Letnic, Gilbert Ludwig, Robbie A. McDonald

Abstract

Recent advances highlight the potential for predators to restore ecosystems and confer resilience against globally threatening processes, including climate change and biological invasions. However, releasing the ecological benefits of predators entails significant challenges. Here, we discuss the economic, environmental and social considerations affecting predator-driven ecological restoration programmes, and suggest approaches for reducing the undesirable impacts of predators. Because the roles of predators are context dependent, we argue for increased emphasis on predator functionality in ecosystems and less on the identities and origins of species and genotypes. We emphasise that insufficient attention is currently given to the importance of variation in the social structures and behaviours of predators in influencing the dynamics of trophic interactions. Lastly, we outline experiments specifically designed to clarify the ecological roles of predators and their potential utility in ecosystem restoration.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 555 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 10 2%
Australia 6 1%
France 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 511 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 121 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 116 21%
Researcher 93 17%
Student > Bachelor 76 14%
Professor 25 5%
Other 87 16%
Unknown 37 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 316 57%
Environmental Science 138 25%
Social Sciences 13 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 1%
Other 14 3%
Unknown 56 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2019.
All research outputs
#266,754
of 14,325,674 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#161
of 2,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,584
of 121,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#2
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,325,674 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.