You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Health-related welfare prioritisation of canine disorders using electronic health records in primary care practice in the UK
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Veterinary Research, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12917-019-1902-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer F. Summers, Dan G. O’Neill, David Church, Lisa Collins, David Sargan, David C. Brodbelt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 42% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Portugal | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 89% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 35 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 25 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 36 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,498,262
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#77
of 3,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,386
of 368,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#2
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.