You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inter-amphibian predation in the Early Cretaceous of China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-44247-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lida Xing, Kecheng Niu, Susan E. Evans |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 316 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 43 | 14% |
| Brazil | 24 | 8% |
| France | 16 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 4% |
| Japan | 13 | 4% |
| Canada | 7 | 2% |
| Thailand | 4 | 1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Unknown | 170 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 266 | 84% |
| Scientists | 45 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 215. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#183,303
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#2,230
of 142,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,573
of 365,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#63
of 3,047 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,047 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.