↓ Skip to main content

Endovascular versus conventional medical treatment for uncomplicated chronic type B aortic dissection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endovascular versus conventional medical treatment for uncomplicated chronic type B aortic dissection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006512.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pinar Ulug, James E McCaslin, Gerard Stansby, Janet T Powell

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
China 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 56 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Master 12 20%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 4 7%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 75%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Psychology 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 6 10%