You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Enlightened One-Party Rule? Ideological Differences between Chinese Communist Party Members and the Mass Public
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Political Research Quarterly, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1065912919850342 |
| Authors |
Chengyuan Ji, Junyan Jiang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 17% |
| China | 3 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 2% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 78% |
| Scientists | 5 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 35% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 15 | 41% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2020.
All research outputs
#929,758
of 25,562,515 outputs
Outputs from Political Research Quarterly
#132
of 1,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,418
of 364,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Political Research Quarterly
#7
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,562,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.