↓ Skip to main content

The variable effectiveness of hedging strategies

Overview of attention for article published in International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The variable effectiveness of hedging strategies
Published in
International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, May 2019
DOI 10.1093/irap/lcz007
Authors

John D Ciorciari

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 71%
Unspecified 4 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 8 38%
Arts and Humanities 5 24%
Social Sciences 4 19%
Philosophy 2 10%
Decision Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2019.
All research outputs
#10,221,194
of 13,401,642 outputs
Outputs from International Relations of the Asia-Pacific
#104
of 148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,202
of 245,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Relations of the Asia-Pacific
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,401,642 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 148 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.