↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of coffee floral traits under two different agricultural practices

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparison of coffee floral traits under two different agricultural practices
Published in
Scientific Reports, May 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-43753-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Guiti Prado, Jaime A. Collazo, Philip C. Stevenson, Rebecca E. Irwin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 60%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 11 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,152,094
of 16,585,337 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#18,210
of 88,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,638
of 270,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,585,337 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 88,330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them