↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of organisational infrastructures to promote evidence-based nursing practice

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of organisational infrastructures to promote evidence-based nursing practice
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002212.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerd Flodgren, Maria Ximena Rojas-Reyes, Nick Cole, David R Foxcroft

Abstract

Nurses and midwives form the bulk of the clinical health workforce and play a central role in all health service delivery. There is potential to improve health care quality if nurses routinely use the best available evidence in their clinical practice. Since many of the factors perceived by nurses as barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) lie at the organisational level, it is of interest to devise and assess the effectiveness of organisational infrastructures designed to promote EBP among nurses.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 202 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 3%
Student > Bachelor 6 3%
Unspecified 5 2%
Other 4 2%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 155 76%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Unspecified 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 155 76%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,943,675
of 13,218,736 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,516
of 10,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,876
of 119,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,218,736 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.