↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of organisational infrastructures to promote evidence-based nursing practice

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of organisational infrastructures to promote evidence-based nursing practice
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002212.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerd Flodgren, Maria Ximena Rojas-Reyes, Nick Cole, David R Foxcroft

Abstract

Nurses and midwives form the bulk of the clinical health workforce and play a central role in all health service delivery. There is potential to improve health care quality if nurses routinely use the best available evidence in their clinical practice. Since many of the factors perceived by nurses as barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) lie at the organisational level, it is of interest to devise and assess the effectiveness of organisational infrastructures designed to promote EBP among nurses.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 200 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 13%
Student > Master 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 3%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 102 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 38 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 17%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 2%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 105 51%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,207,913
of 14,137,193 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,792
of 10,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,597
of 120,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,137,193 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.