You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Psychological interventions for people with psychotic experiences: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1041-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma Soneson, Debra Russo, Clare Knight, Louise Lafortune, Margaret Heslin, Jan Stochl, Alex Georgiadis, Julieta Galante, Robbie Duschinsky, Nick Grey, Leticia Gonzalez-Blanco, Juliet Couche, Michelle Griffiths, Hannah Murray, Nesta Reeve, Joanne Hodgekins, Paul French, David Fowler, Sarah Byford, Mary Dixon-Woods, Peter B. Jones, Jesus Perez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 36% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 20% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 36 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 21 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 42 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,950,897
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#327
of 1,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,208
of 348,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#7
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.