↓ Skip to main content

Injection allergen immunotherapy for asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
25 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
333 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Injection allergen immunotherapy for asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001186.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael J Abramson, Robert M Puy, John M Weiner

Abstract

Allergen specific immunotherapy has long been a controversial treatment for asthma. Although beneficial effects upon clinically relevant outcomes have been demonstrated in randomised controlled trials, there remains a risk of severe and sometimes fatal anaphylaxis. The recommendations of professional bodies have ranged from cautious acceptance to outright dismissal. With increasing interest in new allergen preparations and methods of delivery, we updated the systematic review of allergen specific immunotherapy for asthma.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 173 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 18%
Other 31 17%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Other 38 21%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 26 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2018.
All research outputs
#594,413
of 12,409,853 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,697
of 8,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,945
of 116,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,409,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.