↓ Skip to main content

Phenotypical and functional characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow: comparison of culture using different media supplemented with human platelet lysate or fetal bovine serum

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phenotypical and functional characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow: comparison of culture using different media supplemented with human platelet lysate or fetal bovine serum
Published in
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/scrt97
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nesrine Ben Azouna, Faouzi Jenhani, Zohra Regaya, Lamia Berraeis, Tarek Ben Othman, Elfi Ducrocq, Jorge Domenech

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent cells able to differentiate into several mesenchymal lineages, classically derived from bone marrow (BM) but potentially from umbilical cord blood (UCB). Although they are becoming a good tool for regenerative medicine, they usually need to be expanded in fetal bovine serum (FBS)-supplemented media. Human platelet lysate (HPL) has recently been proposed as substitute for safety reasons, but it is not yet clear how this supplement influences the properties of expanded MSCs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Russia 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 189 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 24%
Researcher 38 20%
Student > Bachelor 25 13%
Student > Master 23 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 22 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 16%
Engineering 11 6%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 28 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2014.
All research outputs
#2,530,266
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#178
of 2,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,736
of 250,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,410 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them