↓ Skip to main content

Stem cell treatment for acute myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
236 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stem cell treatment for acute myocardial infarction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006536.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clifford DM, Fisher SA, Brunskill SJ, Doree C, Mathur A, Watt S, Martin-Rendon E, Clifford, David M, Fisher, Sheila A, Brunskill, Susan J, Doree, Carolyn, Mathur, Anthony, Watt, Suzanne, Martin-Rendon, Enca

Abstract

Stem cell therapy offers a promising approach to the regeneration of damaged vascular and cardiac tissue after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This has resulted in multiple randomised controlled trials (RCTs) worldwide.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Ireland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 157 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 22%
Student > Master 30 18%
Student > Bachelor 30 18%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 4 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 11%
Engineering 9 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 8 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2017.
All research outputs
#768,162
of 14,122,427 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,364
of 10,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,705
of 120,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,122,427 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.