You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A RASSF1A-HIF1α loop drives Warburg effect in cancer and pulmonary hypertension
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-10044-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Swati Dabral, Christian Muecke, Chanil Valasarajan, Mario Schmoranzer, Astrid Wietelmann, Gregg L. Semenza, Michael Meister, Thomas Muley, Tamina Seeger-Nukpezah, Christos Samakovlis, Norbert Weissmann, Friedrich Grimminger, Werner Seeger, Rajkumar Savai, Soni S. Pullamsetti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 11% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,694,559
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#30,284
of 47,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,999
of 351,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#901
of 1,351 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,351 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.