↓ Skip to main content

Implementing an intervention to improve decision making around referral and admission to intensive care: Results of feasibility testing in three NHS hospitals

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementing an intervention to improve decision making around referral and admission to intensive care: Results of feasibility testing in three NHS hospitals
Published in
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, May 2019
DOI 10.1111/jep.13167
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie Rees, Christopher Bassford, Jeremy Dale, Zoe Fritz, Frances Griffiths, Helen Parsons, Gavin D. Perkins, Anne Marie Slowther

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 18%
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Other 2 12%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 18%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2019.
All research outputs
#4,047,419
of 15,981,099 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
#303
of 1,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,356
of 269,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,981,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.