↓ Skip to main content

Ambassadors of hope, research pioneers and agents of change—individuals’ expectations and experiences of taking part in a randomised trial of an innovative health technology: longitudinal qualitative…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ambassadors of hope, research pioneers and agents of change—individuals’ expectations and experiences of taking part in a randomised trial of an innovative health technology: longitudinal qualitative study
Published in
Trials, May 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3373-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Lawton, Maxine Blackburn, Jenna P. Breckenridge, Nina Hallowell, Conor Farrington, David Rankin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 36%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Unspecified 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 23%
Psychology 4 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 4 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,678,833
of 15,726,245 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,135
of 4,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,173
of 267,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,726,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them