You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Structure and immunogenicity of a stabilized HIV-1 envelope trimer based on a group-M consensus sequence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-10262-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kwinten Sliepen, Byung Woo Han, Ilja Bontjer, Petra Mooij, Fernando Garces, Anna-Janina Behrens, Kimmo Rantalainen, Sonu Kumar, Anita Sarkar, Philip J. M. Brouwer, Yuanzi Hua, Monica Tolazzi, Edith Schermer, Jonathan L. Torres, Gabriel Ozorowski, Patricia van der Woude, Alba Torrents de la Peña, Mariëlle J. van Breemen, Juan Miguel Camacho-Sánchez, Judith A. Burger, Max Medina-Ramírez, Nuria González, Jose Alcami, Celia LaBranche, Gabriella Scarlatti, Marit J. van Gils, Max Crispin, David C. Montefiori, Andrew B. Ward, Gerrit Koopman, John P. Moore, Robin J. Shattock, Willy M. Bogers, Ian A. Wilson, Rogier W. Sanders |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 12% |
| Austria | 1 | 6% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 53% |
| Scientists | 6 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 113 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 27% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 35 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 26 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 33 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,500,779
of 25,262,379 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#29,024
of 55,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,913
of 357,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#709
of 1,291 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,262,379 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,291 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.